Dragon Ball Heroes Ultimate Mission X Gets First Commercial

The first commercial for the card-based fighting game, Dragon Ball Heroes Ultimate Mission X, has been published. The very brief spot shows Super Saiyan Rose Goku Black, Time Patroller Goku, Hit, Zamasu, Super Saiyan 4 Broly, and others.

In Dragon Ball Heroes Ultimate Mission X, players form teams using five cards from a total of 3,330 to duke it out in 5-vs-5 battles. There are over 240 characters to choose from, which is the most in the series, and there will be new playable characters introduced just for the game. Dragon Ball Heroes Ultimate Mission X, for the Nintendo 3DS will allow players to experience all the different missions from the arcade version of the game – all 8 from Dragon Ball Heroes, all 10 from Dragon Ball Heroes: Galaxy Missions, all 8 from Dragon Ball Heroes: Evil Dragon Missions, and all 10 Dragon Ball Heroes: God Missions. In total there are 36 missions for players to enjoy. Dragon Ball Heroes: Ultimate Mission X will launch in Japan on April 27. It is unlikely this will see a US or European release.

Related: Dragon Ball Heroes: Ultimate Mission X Announced for April 2017

Loading...
  • ButtMen (Linger)

    Dragon Ball Heroes sucks.

  • You opinion

  • ButtMen (Linger)

    Yes i opinion.

  • Anyway in case you missed the news. The Switch Pro Controller is available for pre order at Gamestop online.

    http://www.gamestop.Com/nes/accessories/nintendo-switch-pro-controller/141852

    Get it while you can if you want.

  • Dust

    Yes we opinion

  • Swamp Thing ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

    Meh. I’d rather play DB Fusions.

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Switch is a gimmick no reason to waste money on it

  • Nameless

    Yayaya

  • Nameless

    Buttmen!

  • Nameless

    Nintendo should succeed with Switch

  • People bought that Elite Controller from XBOX for 150 dollars. I haven’t heard much backlash on that.

  • Nameless

    Right

  • Nameless

    Is that game any good?

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Lol, I’m not talking about the controller I’m talking about the console

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Should but probably won’t they are always behind in technology I mean they just released the WiiU a few years ago and are already having to make a new console, while Sony and Microsoft just made an upgraded version that is entirely optional. Nintendo can’t keep up and the WiiU was a massive failure

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    I’d rather play DBRB3

  • ButtMen (Linger)

    If only it existed.

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    It will one day

  • Why I have not seen you complain with both Pro and Scorpio then?

  • Besides if you want state of the art tech then look no further than PC. They are way ahead of both PS and XBOX.

  • Swamp Thing ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

    Haven’t played it yet, but judging by the lets play’s I’ve seen it looks kinda fun.

  • Swamp Thing ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

    Probably because no one on here is talking about the Pro and Scorpio.

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    Btw we can here the new DBS opening song here: youtu.Be/SsrfJoBiHGc

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    The long awaited cool DBS opening will come, at last

  • ButtMen (Linger)

    Much better than the first opening.

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    yeah the first was fine for the first episodes but then I found it kinda annoying

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    Will the fanservice power bring Cell, Tapion and Bardock in Super?

    (Super is the show where Frieza, Future Trunks came back, tournaments came back, Goku and Vegeta kicking @sses, Piccolo and Gohan back to kick @asses, an evil Goku in a duo of threatening villains, a Broly-like character introduced)

  • Swamp Thing ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

    The mascots for the 2020 Olympics are Goku, Naruto and Luffy.

  • ButtMen (Linger)

    There are going to be more anime character besides them apparently.

    timesofindia.indiatimes.Com/sports/more-sports/others/tokyo-olympics-unveils-goku-from-dragonball-z-as-a-brand-ambassador/articleshow/56833673.cms

    “Goku will have Naruto, Shin Chan, Sailor Moon, Petty Cure, Luffy and Astroboy for company in the ambassadorial role with their faces plastered over the official merchandises.”

  • ButtMen (Linger)

    New post.

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Lol and have to wonder if I’ll get the games I want, I like my PS4 PC’s are for chumps

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Because they are optional lol. All games that work on them work on the PS4 and XBOXOne if you wish to get a new console you can as they are the same thing. If it was a New WiiU I wouldn’t be complaining at all, if it had the same features. Yet Nintendo is ceasing all things WiiU and going with the switch to try and compete with Sony and Microsoft.

  • Koibito888

    Bardock no lol he’s dead. Unless we get a flashback showing him off, but nothing new. Tapion hopefully not, he is very much an example of a character who you can tell is movie filler (unlike Broly who still looks and feels like he belongs in DBZ) and part of his story was one of the worst explanations of anything ever (giving his sword to Trunks). Cell? Lol no more than already was last episode.

    Super is the show were some characters came back but it’s also Toriyama’s story and follows his style. While yes we’ve had the fad of evil Goku brought to life in canon, a character with Legendary Super Saiyan, Frieza returning, all that – each one has very much more so been focused towards new concepts, though keeping them to concepts familiar to the DB world. We got evil Goku but in a very unique fashion that delved pretty deep into new territory that yes, had to do with the Kai, but the Kai are very much a concept not delved into much by any other DB thing. Frieza came back but it was the first time Toriyama brought back a Z villain in full capacity like that, first time he had someone use the dragon balls, first time we delved into the rather mysterious being and ability that is Frieza and his power and forms. To say Broly-like is a stretch, her backstory, personality, actions are gonna have to be similar before we can say they are Broly-like, she JUST has the same transformation which hopefully gets explained and will provide new dimension on the Saiyans.

    Point being even though Super revisits concepts, those revisited concepts are done so for the purpose of revealing new layers of it. It wont (and shouldn’t) be bringing back concepts JUST to bring them back. Cell would accomplish nothing new, Tapion would at best be made reference to by making some other universe’s character with like a similar look but it wouldn’t be Tapion and it wouldn’t be a comeback in any meaningful sense beyond a reference, and Bardock too wouldn’t bring anything new to the table that glimpses at the U6 Saiyans wont give.

  • Koibito888

    Naw I love the first opening. I still sing along with it every week.

  • Koibito888

    I’d rather never get another RB or Tenkaichi game ever.

    We need DBZ games where characters actually fight differently and feel like they do in the series and at least have SOME decent story focus. Tenkaichi and RB were very overrated.

    Plus DBZ is pretty much the only mainstream anime big enough to get a game where character creation actually works. It shouldn’t lose that.

  • Koibito888

    I don’t know if gaming perfectly from TV to handheld is a gimmick. Kinda been the dream for a while. Connectivity from gameboy games to the N64, Gameboy Advanced connecting to the gamecube, Vita remote play, – console to handheld has been an inevitable evolution of gaming and something everyone has wanted to try for a long time. Switch is the first one to do it seamlessly and perfectly so that you’re literally just taking the game with you. Plus gamer focus and third party support. These are the main things about the Switch entirely and that’s not a gimmick.

    Everything else with the different controllers and stuff are just side effects of that are are cool features. Gimmicks, at least ‘gimmick’ in the negative connotation of the word, in gaming are entirely focused on themselves, they don’t add anything to the normal experience. Virtual reality, the 360 Kinect, these kinds of things can really only be built on to focus on the function themselves, games need to be built around these things. 3D on the 3DS, the touchpad on the PS4 controllers, the kinect as it works now on One, these things are out of the way, games don’t need to be built around them, they are conveniences to the system as if it were another button.

    The Switch is first and foremost a core gamer console (unlike the overly casual friendly attitudes of the Wii and the start of the Wiiu) with new features and innovations (that have been long awaited) that will just be able to add to the normal gaming experience instead of requiring games to be built around them. It’s not a gimmick it’s a real game console.

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Well to be fair it will be limited to what they get overall and with it’s lesser capacity. I consider it more of a gimmick since instead of trying to catch up to Sony and Microsoft they do this, that’s why the WiiU Failed don’t get me wrong it’s an awesome idea and innovative but how long is it going to last?

  • Koibito888

    Console wars are not as big to the companies as they are to the gamers and this is especially true between Nintendo who never has been out to directly compete with the others as much as they focus on being their own thing separate from them. So Nintendo is not doing this to compete with Sony and Microsoft, correct, but that is NOT why the Wii and WiiU failed. The Wii and WiiU failed because they were not focused on the core gamer. Nintendo had always been a company that made games that were challenging enough for adults but colorful enough for kids. They still made those games but with the little third party focus they had, the rest of their games were casual little crap games making the majority of the library and by extension the console, not for gamers which should ALWAYS be the main focus. The WiiU changed direction later on but the WiiU ultimately failed because they did so too late for anyone to care. That’s why trying to catch up to the current gen is not something they should be doing.

    They are doing this to move on to the next generation and that is likely to focus on the core gamer considering that they came out of the gates with focus on only really gaming. They came out with many titles from them, immediate reveal on just how hard they are going to focus on third party. This system is not about some random thing games will need to be built around, the opposite – this is a console that has been built around gaming.

    ‘Gimmick’ is thrown around too much and too subjectively. Just because you may not see it lasting doesn’t make it a gimmick. If the PS4 hypothetically lasted a year, that wouldn’t make the system a gimmick. A gimmick is a trick, it’s a single hook to grab attention. Used in the negative connotation for gaming it is only a single hook to grab attention, nothing more, and as such adds nothing to the gaming experience and so usually it can’t enhance games as much as games can only enhance it and be built around it. Only so many games can be made for Kinect, that’s something that couldn’t last it required games to be built around it instead of just existing as a convenient piece of a whole thing. That’s why the One Kinnect works like it does, as a very convenient voice command setting that is pretty much the same as another button on the controller, a piece of the whole that is just that, a whole game console made for gaming, not for a one shot gimmick.

    That’s what the Switch is. It’s a whole game console and that is it’s main function, for games to be played on it. The Wii had motion controls as it’s main way of play. It was an innovation that was the main focus of the console at first, eventually it became less and less gimmicky as more big games like Smash Bros came for it to be used just like a new controller instead of a new way to play but before that, that’s what made it a gimmick.

    Nothing about the switch is gimmicky. Nothing about the switch says that it’s trying to make a new niche method of gaming that has to be built around but can’t be built around for long. The main way of playing Switch is the same way as gaming always had been, with a controller. It’s just a controller with new features but the main method of play is as it’s always been, the advent of seamless system to handheld play doesn’t interrupt the main point and merely adds to gaming instead of the other way around, games are the focus of the system and especially because of that the Switch will last as long as any game system as long as games are still made for it and that fresh start is what Nintendo actually needed to do instead of trying to just fix up the WiiU.

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    All good points but you contradict yourself, the switch’s main feature is a gimmick, and yes that is why the Wii and U failed you are correct, but there’s rumors that Nintendo won’t keep the 3rd party support and is using it as a catch to bring people in and again it will be limited games to beging with. The PS4 wouldn’t be a gimmick because it’s just an upgraded Playstation as have the others. Yet the Switch is advertising the take on the go (with a horrible battery life) which is indeed a gimmick.

  • Koibito888

    Incorrect. Take on the go play is not a gimmick. Again, it is an inevitable progression of gaming that has been tried and desired since way long ago. It’s also not some new, niche way to play that games will need to be built around. To say the switch’s main feature is a gimmick is the same as saying all handheld gaming is a gimmick which it most certainly is not.

    Just being new and innovative doesn’t make something a gimmick. Nintendo’s next system doesn’t need to be the wiiu2 just to not be a gimmick. A gimmick in gaming is a one trick pony, it’s something games need to interrupt themselves from just being games to fit a new niche single trick. Portable gaming is an entire dimension of gaming that requires no special attention and doesn’t stop games from being just games. It is not gimmicky at all.

    And there’s rumors they’ll drop third party support. Based on what? What basis does anyone have to go on that’s NOT just pessimism? Because the Wii and WiiU is not a good enough answer when the WiiU caused Nintendo to drastically change direction back to the core gamers before all this. Logically speaking Nintendo learned their lesson and so unless there is some real substantial evidence not based on Nintendo prior to having that revelation, that rumor is bunk and is based on nothing more than just being negative.

  • The Real Tobi (Cana)

    Again it is indeed a gimmick. As that’s what Nintendo’s mainly focusing on, sure it is the future of things but trying it now and doing this to show off and try to get an upper hand is indeed a gimmick. I’m not using it negatively but when they are trying to use that as the main selling point of it. It comes off that way. I never said all handheld games were gimmicks, as they aren’t. A portable console though yeah it is.

    “Gimmick-a trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business.” That’s what the Switch has done, if it was just another console it probably wouldn’t attract near the amount of attention it does, still a lot but that is it’s huge selling point on why to get it over a PS4, XBOXOne or PC.

    I haven’t read all the arguments and sure it is entirely possible it’s foundless they are just going on history which is always good. A Leopard doesn’t change it’s spots. Not saying they won’t but just brushing it off as pessimism is not good either. It’s entirely possible and is just a theory at this point. Being wary before paying 300+ dollars on something is never wrong, I was the same way with my PS4.

  • Koibito888

    All a handheld system is IS a portable console. That’s literally what it is. So yes, if you think what the Switch is doing is a gimmick then handheld gaming is a gimmick. Considering aside from battery power that this is pretty much the best application of handheld gaming, to say that this is a gimmick is to say that handheld gaming is an even lesser gimmick. Also you really are using it negatively, your entire point started with “Switch is a gimmick, no need to waste money on it”, you literally questioned how long it will last because of these things. That’s the very definition of the negative connotation of the word gimmick.

    And I just can’t stress to you enough how very much exactly the same this is to handheld gaming. You cannot separate the two. This is literally the same thing as if your WiiU could poop out a 3DS that played games with the same quality as the console. The handheld function of the Switch very much is a connected handheld system. So yes, it is an indisputable fact, this is the exact same thing as handheld gaming, just better. If you think the Switch’s application of this function is a gimmick then you do think all handheld gaming is too, there is no getting around that. It is the same.

    It’s the selling point but not the focus. It is a big selling point but nothing about neither the console nor the games are sacrificed for it. Games will not need to dumb themselves down to be built around this new function, the console didn’t sacrifice superior graphics or what games it will have or it’s demographic, gaming is the focus, portability is the selling point but gaming is the focus.

    Going on history is always good. But focusing only on history without regard for the variables of the present and future is not only closed minded but objectively a flawed way of thinking. Yes. You use history to predict the future but when change is apparent and right in front of your face, to just ignore it is blatantly and purposefully ignorant. It is pessimism to assume that nothing can change.

    Perfect example:

    When the WiiU came out, Nintendo literally showed no signs of change from the casual gamer focus of the Wii. None whatsoever. When the WiiU first came out I was negative about it and my Nintendo fanboy friends got on my case about it. I told them look, I want Nintendo to change, I want them to just realize their crap and focus on the core gamer – I accepted the possibility of the change but saw no hints of it. I started off hating the WiiU.

    This is much like what you are doing, accepting the possibility of change but the difference is there was no sign of change back then.

    – Since then, the sales of the Wii caused Nintendo such a loss that all the top dogs had to take a huge paycut just to not fire anyone over it, yeah no that doesn’t just go unnoticed without some change happening.

    – Proven correct as when right after that, Nintendo immediately made a huge apology and statement about how they were going to focus on gaming.

    – After that, the WiiU did get better and I even own one with enough games to justify having had it. Only problem was it was too late really.

    – Nintendo’s very next move was to make a system in which they focused entirely on gaming both in house and third party.

    These are things that did not happen with the Wii to WiiU. These were not variables that existed then that do now.

    So, with these variables in place, to look at all that happened and to go ‘well it happened before’ when the ‘before’ you’re talking about is before they learned their lesson, then the information supporting this rumor is outdated and as such is an invalid perspective in the face of new events to just say they’ll happen again.

    I understand being weary of a product, but there is a difference between being weary and outright being negative. When the proof piles up for the change happening with no proof of it not, and you still just assume it wont, that is being negative. Saying ‘no need to waste money on it’ isn’t being weary of spending something or not, that’s already making your decision that it’s going to be bad before even considering the evidence for history to not repeat itself and that is being pessimistic.

  • “Your Pal” Palpatine (LordF)

    Well DBRB3 is not Tenkaichi and is not RB to be honest, I assume that you didn’t hear about the project but it has character creation (which proposes more than Xenoverse)

  • Andrew Blagburn

    I don’t know why we can’t get this. They could make card packs available at gamestop and other retailers, they could even be blind packs, duplicates means more people buying them and they’d sell like mad. Smh developers.

  • Goku Black

    They’re focus on “ONLY JAPAN” than “HOLY CRAP! PEOPLE LIKE THIS OVER SEAS?! QUICK! SELL IT TO THEM!
    (・`⌓´・) ރ “

  • Ryoma

    Bsm Allah alrhamn alrahem

  • Ryoma

    La to8olon bkrh al mdrsa! Takafa.

  • Ryoma

    Slam 3lekm