Dragon Ball Super October 2017 Schedule

Posted on September 24, 2017


In October, the Tournament of Power heats up as the strongest warriors engage in a battle to determine the fate of their universes. First up, it’s Goku vs Universe 11’s Jiren in a two-episode special on October 8. However, it seems our hero does not have the power to take down the Universe 11 warrior so Universe 6’s Hit steps in episode 111. How will that fight fare and is Goku down for the count or is he just on the sidelines temporarily?! We’ll have to watch the electrifying episodes of Dragon Ball Super in October to find out!

The month will kick off a new ending theme. It will be titled “By A 70cm Square Window” and it will be by Japanese rock/pop group RottenGraffty. This will be the tenth ending for Dragon Ball Super since the series made its debut back in July of 2015.

  • October 01, 2017
  • October 08, 2017
    Dragon Ball Super Episode 109 – The Ultimate Enemy Approaches Goku! Now, Let Loose! The Killer Spirit Bomb!
    Dragon Ball Super Episode 110 – This is the Ultimate Battle of All Universes! Son Goku vs Jiren!!
    A two episode special episode. As half of the time in the Tournament of Power passed, the gods of Universe 11 order their warrior, Jiren, to crush Universe 7’s Goku. Goku is thrilled he gets to battle Jiren, who is the strongest warrior of Universe 11. As soon as Jiren releases his energy, however, it overwhelms all the fighters in the tournament. To counter, Goku transforms into Super Saiyan Blue and pushes himself to the limit with Kaioken, but even that’s not enough!
  • October 15, 2017
    Dragon Ball Super Episode 111 – Hit vs Jiren
    No summary available at the moment.
  • October 22, 2017
    Dragon Ball Super Episode 112 – Vegeta’s Resolve
    No summary available at the moment.
  • October 29, 2017
    Dragon Ball Super Episode 113 – Combat-Loving Saiyan Battle
    No summary available at the moment.

Via Herms98

  • Samara

    Irrelevant. Object A doesn’t get a free pass just because Object B suffers from similar or worse issues. The flaws of Object A continue to exist irrespective of the existence of Object B.

  • Ryumancer

    Object A and Object B are made by the same person so that point is horrifically moot.

  • Samara

    This is faulty logic. The flaw in Object A wouldn’t be any more or less of a flaw just because it was created by the creator of another object. Object B doesn’t need to be a factor in determining the specification of Object A, suggesting that it does would be like suggesting that all farts that come out of a persons backside need to be examined before being able to determine whether or not the next fart has the flaw of being smelly, simply because they all come out of the same persons backside.

  • Ryumancer

    You either aren’t taking this very seriously or you have a BIIIIIIG stick up your behind, bro.

    Dragonball is rife with inconsistencies (whether it be the original, Z, GT or Super), most of which was done by Toriyama, who’s INFAMOUS for being inconsistent. Since Super is done by the same person as Z and the original, it shouldn’t be one damn bit surprising that inconsistencies are in that show as well. If that’s bugging you, your standards are too high.

    Calm down, eat a Kit-Kat, get laid, have a colonic, I don’t care. But chill the eff out. Seriously.

  • Samara

    These are to use your own words horrifically moot points, because they don’t have any direct baring on the aforementioned points we were discussing. Variation of inconsistency predictability in Object A for example, doesn’t alter the validity of the inconsistency or the unnecessity of Object B in assessing it’s validity. The need to affirm your stance on inconsistency predictability wasn’t required as it wasn’t contested by either of us, the same could be said regarding our personal standards and irritation levels, which are all simply off topic. If you do have any points to make about moral equivalence or even objective realty, then do feel free to make them, but please try to refrain from the Ad hominem; you don’t need to make further logical fallacies.

  • Ryumancer

    Well too f**king bad. Toriyama made both series, which are part of the same FRANCHISE, so it shouldn’t be a surprise at all that they both have inconsistencies.

    Trying to prove otherwise is a waste of your time as well as mine.

  • Samara

    You’re repeating the same irrelevant point about inconsistency predictability that I’ve already addressed and have never disagreed with incidentally. The burden is now on you to show why your point is relevant to mine and why inconsistency predictability makes a moral equivalence fallacy valid. (I’ll give you a hint – it doesn’t)

    Once again, if you do have any alternate points to make about moral equivalence or maybe even objective realty that would attempt to refute my earlier logic, then I’d welcome it, however since I currently don’t see any, I will be claiming victory in this discussion, since my logic currently stands and yours does not.

  • Ryumancer


    Pretty sure the people above this paragraph would agree with me.

    I’m repeating the same point because it doesn’t seem to be penetrating that thick skull of yours. I have no burden of proof considering it’s in plain view right in front of you.

    You have no logic. They’re both Dragonball, they’re both made by Toriyama and they both have inconsistencies. You really need to work on that smug-ass attitude of yours.

  • Samara

    What does not seem to be penetrating your skull, is the fact that I – presumably along with the two people that you referenced, agree with the point that you continue to repeat, despite your attempts to suggest otherwise.
    There has however never been any attempt on your part to show why this point of yours (which we agree on) is at all relevant to moral equivalence or anything that I’ve been referring too, hence why you do have a burden of proof; not to show why your point is correct, but to show why it is at all relevant to mine. If you are unable to do this, which appears to be the case, or if you are unable to come up with any alternate points, then my logic stands, while yours does not.

    Additionally, I will remind you that Ad hominem will not help your case.

  • Ryumancer

    You haven’t agreed with jack crap. Quit making stuff up.

    Your arrogance and uppity attitude are what’s wrong with the internet nowadays. You act all brave because nobody knows who you are and you hide behind a keyboard.

    And like I keep saying, your point doesn’t hold as much water as mine does.

  • Samara

    If you believe whatever point you think you have left which hasn’t already been completely destroyed by me holds more water than mine, then you need to prove that it does, which you continue to be incapable of even attempting to do, let alone succeeding to do, hence why I can continue to claim to be the victor in this discussion.

    As for whether or not I’m making up the fact that I’ve always agreed with your repeated irrelevant point that you mistakenly thought I disagreed with, I can prove that my stance on your point has been consistent by quoting myself – “You’re repeating the same irrelevant point about inconsistency predictability that I’ve already addressed and have never disagreed with incidentally As you can see it’s been my position that your point wasn’t incorrect for some time, meaning you’re incorrect that I had made this up in my prior post. It’s up to you whether you wish to be receptive about this or not.

    Finally whether you think I’m arrogant or not has no bearing on the points that I’m making. The fact that you’re resorting to attacking me more often, as opposed to my point, only further demonstrates that my argument is sound and that you’re getting increasingly desperate. I’d also like to point out that I don’t know who you are, and you are also hiding behind a keyboard – In fact, all of your comments are private while mine are not, so the Ad hominem is hypocritical on this occasion; you are seemingly more hidden than I.

  • Ryumancer

    It’s not the World Series, jackass. There’s no victory here. All you’re doing is pissing one person off just for the sake of entertainment. You know what does that? A troll. They usually have a crap attitude, make zero sense with their crap points, and get off on how ridiculous their own argument is. That’s you ALL OVER.

    If you were agreeing with me, you wouldn’t be keeping up this argument like this much of an a$$hole. Simple as that.

    Now who’s repeating? You keep saying “Ad hominem” like it’s going out of style. Got any synonyms? Anything RELEVANT to say?